|Date Created||August 1, 2021|
|Target End Date||January 31, 2022|
|Slack||#wg_merge-request-report-widgets (only accessible from within the company)|
|Google Doc||Merge Request Report Widgets Working Group Agenda (only accessible from within the company)|
|Pajamas documentation||Region: Merge request reports|
|Design specs||Pajamas UI Kit|
The working group ensures consistent alignment and development of all Merge Request (MR) Report Widgets. By synchronizing a collection of independently created widgets into a single report region, a code reviewer should have an easier time reviewing the merge request analysis and determining next steps.
The working group is tasked with creating a joint codebase where consistency is at the core of each widget. It's enforced and achieved by the codebase and established APIs.
Drive forward the adoption goals through usability by facilitating improvements to merge requests that will positively impact the shared FY22-Q3 KR between Product and UX. By following the UX Framework, we ensure the level of maturity expected by customers dealing with merge requests. From now on, we will have clear and strict guidance to ensure sustainable and consistent growth for the MR Widget ecosystem.
The main target of the working group is not to implement everything themselves but rather keep the effort moving across the frontend engineering and UX groups in a constant pace and pick up key tasks.
Merge Request Reports Region
Merge Request Widget Extensions
Merge Request Widget Extension Component (docs)
The functional leads will be responsible for:
Ideally, the functional lead is someone who is an IC working in the affected groups, but anyone capable of representing a group, department, or sub-department in the fashion mentioned above is welcome.
|Working Group Role||Person||Stakeholder Dept.||Title|
|Executive Sponsor||Tim Zallmann||Dev||Director of Engineering, Dev|
|Facilitator||André Luís||Dev, Create:Code Review||Frontend Engineering Manager|
|Functional Lead||Tim Noah||UX||Senior Product Designer|
|Functional Lead||Phil Hughes||Create:Code Review||Staff Frontend Engineer|
|Functional Lead||José Iván Vargas López||Verify:Pipeline Execution||Senior Frontend Engineer|
|Functional Lead||Scott Hampton||Verify:Testing||Acting Engineering Manager|
|Functional Lead||Daniel Tian||Secure:Threat Insights||Senior Frontend Engineer|
|Functional Lead||Mark Florian||Foundations||Senior Frontend Engineer|
|Functional Lead||Paul Gascou-Vaillancourt||Secure||Frontend Engineer|
|Functional Lead||Jeremy Elder||UX||Staff Product Designer|
|Member||Marcel van Remmerden||UX||Product Design Manager, Create|
|Member||Kai Armstrong||Product||Sr. Product Manager, Create:Code Review|
|Member||Rayana Verissimo||UX||Product Design Manager, CI/CD|
|Member||Payton Burdette||Verify:Pipeline Execution||Senior Frontend Engineer|
|Member||Pedro Moreira da Silva||UX||Staff Product Designer, Create:Code Review|
|Member||Tomislav Nikić||Quality||Software Engineer in Test, Create:Code Review|