The Sales Strategy team is involved in multiple projects in the areas of Analytics, GTM and Field Planning.
Provide visibility of Gitlab expansion within the top 2000 Global Forbes accounts.
To allow SFDC reporting by Forbes rank, we created a 1:1 relationship between every Forbes account and a single SFDC account.
The original issue can be found here.
The following rules were applied for the matching:
The matched file for 2020 can be found here.
As the matching was mostly automatic, it is far from perfect. If any issue is identified, please reach out to the Sales Strategy team to have it corrected.
The report will be updated once a year around June. The Sales Strategy team is responsible for the matching and the Sales Ops team for the upload.
This placeholder will be updated once the fields are added.
This placeholder will be updated once project is complete.
The purpose of the Rosetta Stone project is to ensure that we have clean, standardized reporting by segment, geo, region, and area that can be used to slice and dice all company metrics. This project is a collaborative, cross-functional effort involving many teams across GitLab, including Sales Strategy, Sales Ops, Sales Systems, Finance, Marketing, and the Data Team.
Prior to FY22, sales managers were comped based on who owned the ACCOUNT at the time of opportunity close. We therefore based our top level business reporting by sales team on the account_owner_team stamped field on the Opportunity object in Salesforce. However, there were also various other Salesforce fields that were used in certain reporting, which led to a lot of confusion and discrepancies between reports. For more details on historical reporting, please see this slide deck.
Starting in FY22, we made a change to our comp plans. We began paying both reps and managers based on who owns the OPPORTUNITY at the time of close. With this change, we also needed to change our reporting from being based on account ownership to being based on opportunity ownership. Thus the Rosetta Stone project was born, with the goal of not only building correct reporting based on opportunity ownership but also of cleaning up the Salesforce fields used for reporting so that we can all easily get the same correct answer.
In order to achieve clean reporting by sales team based on opportunity ownership, in Dec 2020 we created 4 new fields on the User object in Salesforce:
These fields are used to identify on which Sales team a Salesforce user works. If the user is not on the Enterprise or Commercial Sales teams (such as Channel reps, ISRs, BDRs, Community Advocates, or members of Sales Ops or Sales Strategy), the fields will default to "Other."
These fields are populated manually by Sales Ops on the user record as part of normal Salesforce license provisioning. Sales Ops populates the fields for every new user added to SFDC and updates the fields every time a user changes Sales teams.
We stamp the values from these fields onto our opportunity records at various points during the sales cycle, and we use these fields to tell us which sales team worked on each opportunity.
For more info on user hierarchy, please see this page.
We also have segment/geo/region/area fields on the Account object in Salesforce that mirror those on the User object. The Account fields sometimes share the same values as the User fields but are based on characteristics of the Account rather than characteristics of the sales rep who worked on the Account.
For example, a stamped opp owner user segment of "Large" indicates that a sales rep from our Enterprise Sales Team worked on that Account whereas an account sales segment of "Large" indicates that the account has a certain number of employees. In some cases the user segment and account segment can differ, such as if a sales rep from our Mid-Market Sales Team works on an Account that is in the "Large" sales segment based on its number of employees.
While most of our sales performance reporting is based on the sales team that worked on a particular opportunity, there are use cases in which we want to report on Account characteristics as well. It's important that we have clean, standardized reporting on both ends and that everyone understands the differences in these two types of reporting.
The project plan for Rosetta Stone and all of the associated issues can be found here. To summarize, our steps are:
The ideal end state for this project would be that:
These fields would serve as key dimensions used to slice all reporting and would flow from SFDC into our trusted data framework in the data warehouse to be used for standardized reporting across the company.
