The GitLab Support Team may very well be unique among the many teams within the company in that its multiple sub-teams each have the same charter. Making decisions and managing change within this structure come with equally unique challenges not faced by the other teams. Specifically, managers must determine the appropriate scope - whether to act individually or in coordination with the other managers - when they want to make a decision or introduce a process change. And the worldwide support management team must agree that the scoping is correct. We define here our most current processes for determining scope, gathering data and feedback, choosing a path forward, rolling out a change, managing adoption, and reviewing results for future improvements.
One of the most important considerations when looking to make a change is what the scope of the change will be.
When thinking about whether a change should be local or global, you might be tempted to focus on the size of the change (number of lines of code changed, number of lines of text in a doc that changed, etc.). But that’s actually a different type of scope that isn’t relevant to this discussion.
Instead, begin with the idea that for the sake of consistency and simplicity, you should lean toward making your change globally unless it doesn't even make sense for, or apply to, other regions. If you're considering making the change locally, be sure that you can answer "no" to all of these questions about potential impacts of making a local change:
Whether you’re making a local change, based on the decision criteria above, or proposing a global one, it’s important to communicate your plans with the rest of the Support Leadership Team.
Remember to communicate why and not just what.
Even for a change that you’ve determined will be local, inform the leadership team. Put it as an “inform” item in the agenda for the next leadership sync meeting. Why?
Once you’ve determined that your intended change must be global, engage the leadership team in a conversation through your issue and through a full agenda topic in the leadership sync meeting:
We make data driven decisions whenever possible. If your proposed change doesn't have any supporting data, you'll run one or more localized trials. Be frugal if there is a cost and always be sensitive to disrupting existing workflows: