There may be times when a request comes in that seems to need input from our Legal team. This workflow explains how to handle such a request when it does not fit into one of the prescribed workflows.
From time to time we may receive subpoenas or other legal requests for information about GitLab users, their data or activity. This workflow clarifies how to handle these requests and subsequent workflow related to delivering information if our counsel and CISO approve.
Note: If a ticket comes in that you believe is Legal related, but is not a subpoena or court order, please check the list of other legal workflows.
If a subpoena or court order that is not covered by another workflow (e.g. DMCA, GDPR, information request) comes in:
Legal::Subpoena or court order
macro.These workflows should be used when a user question is addressed in a specific Support policy.
Respond to the ticket with the Legal::Namespace and Trademark
macro.
Note: This workflow is specifically related to inquiries about disputes on ownership. You can also check other ownership-related workflows to ensure you are using the correct one.
Respond to the ticket with the Legal::Ownership disputes
macro.
Please see Log requests workflow
A request may come in that you believe needs legal input but does not fit into one of the prescribed workflows. Follow this workflow in such a situation:
Respond to the ticket with the Legal::General
macro
If Legal requests more time, respond to the ticket with the Legal::Handover
macro.
Support should be handling responses to any inquiries for clarifications. In most cases, an existing customer will be referred to their account manager.
If you're unsure on how to respond, post in the #spt_managers
Slack channel for guidance.