GitLab Inc. is a for profit company that balances the need to improve GitLab Community Edition (CE) with the need to add features to GitLab Enterprise Edition (EE) exclusively in order to generate income. We have an open core business model and generate almost all our revenue with subscriptions to use Enterprise Edition. We recognize that we need to balance the need to generate income and with the needs of the open source project.
We promise that:
If the wider community contributes a new feature they get to choose if it goes into CE or EE by sending the merge request to the repository they prefer (most go to CE). If the wider community contributes a feature already in EE to CE we use the process linked in Contributing an EE only feature to CE . When GitLab Inc. makes a new features we ask ourselves, is this feature more relevant for organizations that have more than 100 potential users? If the answer is yes the feature is likely to be exclusive to EE.
There are no features that are only useful to larger organizations, so for every EE features there will be smaller organizations that also need it. We're not saying that there are no small organizations that need the EE feature, just that we think that larger organizations are more likely to need it.
We always make sure that CE can do all major features in our scope and there are companies using CE with more than 10,000 users.
If people ask us why a certain feature is EE only we might reply with a link to this section of the handbook. We do not mean to imply you don't need the feature. It implies we think the feature will be more relevant for larger organizations. Feel free to make the argument for the opposite, we're listening.
Sometimes people suggest having features in EE for a limited time. An example of a limited time release strategy is the Business Source License that keeps features propietary for 3 years. At GitLab we want to give everyone access to most of the features (and all the essential ones) at the date they are announced. We want people the option to both run and contribute to an open source edition that is maintained and that includes the most recent security fixes. From time to time we do open source a feature that used to be EE only. We do this in case when in hindsight we realize we made a mistake applying our criteria. An example is when we learned that a branded homepage was an essential feature. Another example is when we brought GitLab Pages to the Community Edition.
Apart from making new features GitLab Inc. does a lot of work that benefits both CE and EE:
When someone contributes a feature to CE that is already in EE we have a hard decision to make. We hope that people focus on contributing features that are neither in CE nor EE. This way both editions benefit from a new feature and GitLab Inc. don't have to make a hard decision. The features we plan to build for EE are shared on our direction page and we welcome people to contribute features to CE that are planned for future EE releases, if you pick one from the upcoming release please ask in the issue if someone is already working on it. When someone does contribute a feature to CE that is already in EE we weigh a couple of factors in that decision:
We'll weight all factors and you can judge our stewardship of CE based on the outcome. So far (July 22, 2016) we had only two cases, one had low code quality and the other one copied the EE code down to the last space. If you find these or other examples please link them here so people can get an idea of the outcome.
In case we're not sure, we'll consult with the core team to reach a conclusion.