Achieve world class enterprise grade readiness and empowering product and development teams to ship software at scale without sacrificing quality, stability or velocity. Enable Engineering and Product organizations to account for quality proactively in the planning process. Relentless focus on internal test and tooling stability for maximum productivity of our Engineering organization.
The quality of the product is our collective responsibility, we the quality department makes sure everyone is aware of what the quality of the product is, empirically.
To execute on this, we categorize our direction into the following areas.
|Mek Stittri||Director of Quality Engineering|
|Ramya Authappan||Quality Engineering Manager, Dev|
|Joanna Shih||Quality Engineering Manager, Ops & CI/CD|
|Tanya Pazitny||Quality Engineering Manager, Secure & Enablement|
|Kyle Wiebers||Interim Quality Engineering Manager, Engineering Productivity|
|Vincy Wilson||Quality Engineering Manager, Growth|
|Rémy Coutable||Staff Backend Engineer, Engineering Productivity|
|Mark Fletcher||Backend Engineer, Engineering Productivity|
|Jen-Shin Lin||Backend Engineer, Engineering Productivity|
|Dan Davison||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Configure|
|Mark Lapierre||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Create:Source Code (primary) & Create:Gitaly (secondary)|
|Sanad Liaquat||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Manage:Access (primary) & Manage:Spaces (secondary)|
|Tomislav Nikić||Software Engineer in Test, Create:Knowledge|
|Zeff Morgan||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Verify:Testing|
|Walmyr Lima e Silva Filho||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Plan:Project Management (primary) & Plan:Portfolio Management (secondary)|
|Tiffany Rea||Software Engineer in Test, Verify:Continuous Integration|
|Sofia Vistas||Software Engineer in Test Monitor:APM (primary) & Monitor:Health (secondary)|
|Grant Young||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Enablement:Memory|
|Jennie Louie||Software Engineer in Test, Enablement:Geo Replication|
|Nailia Iskhakova||Software Engineer in Test, Enablement:Distribution|
|Erick Banks||Senior Software Engineer in Test Enablement:Search|
|Albert Salim||Senior Backend Engineer, Engineering Productivity|
|Désirée Chevalier||Software Engineer in Test, Manage:Import|
|Will Meek||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Secure:Composition Analysis (primary) & Secure:Exposure Analysis (secondary)|
|Anastasia McDonald||Software Engineer in Test, Create:Editor|
|N.W.||Senior Software Engineer in Test, Enablement:Distribution|
Every Software Engineer in Test (SET) takes part in building our product as a DRI in GitLab's Product Quad DRIs. They work alongside Development, Product, and UX in the Product Development Workflow. As stable counterparts, SETs should be considered critical members of the core team between Product Designers, Engineering Managers and Product Managers.
Every Quality Engineering Manager is aligned with an Engineering Director in the Development Department. They work at a higher level and align cross-team efforts which maps to a Development Department section. The area a Quality Engineering Manager is responsible for is defined in the Product Stages and Groups and part of their title in team org chart. This is with the exception of the Engineering Productivity team which is based on the span of control.
Full-stack Engineering Productivity Engineers develop features both internal and external that improves the efficiency of engineers and development processes. Their work is separate from the regular release kickoff features per areas of responsibility.
We staff our department with the following gearing ratios:
We have top level boards (at the
gitlab-org level) to communicate what is being worked on for all teams in quality engineering.
Each board has a cut-line on every column that is owned by an individual. Tasks can be moved vertically to be above or below the cut-line.
The cut-line is used to determine team member capacity, it is assigned to the
Backlog milestone. The board itself pulls from
any milestone as a catch-all so we have insights into past, current and future milestones.
The cut-line also serves as a healthy discussion between engineers and their manager in their 1:1s. Every task on the board should be sized according to our weight definitions.
~"workflow::blocked"to indicate a blocked issue.
The boards serve as a single pane of glass view for each team and help in communicating the overall status broadly, transparently and asynchronously.
Every member in the Quality Department shares the responsibility of analyzing the daily QA tests against
More details can be seen here
To mitigate performance issues, Quality Engineering will triage and groom performance issues for Product Management and Development via a weekly Availability & Performance Grooming. The goal is to make the performance of various aspects of our application empirical with tests, environments, and metrics.
Quality Engineering will ensure that performance issues are identified and/or created on the board with the label
These issues that are surfaced to the grooming meeting will be severitized according to our definitions.
Quality Engineering will focus in identifying issues in the following areas:
A manager in the Quality Engineering department will lead grooming with issues populated before hand in the board. Issues are walked through from high to low severity covering
~S3 performance bugs.
Deliverable of grooming each issue:
Please see the Development department's Infrastructure and Quality collaboration handbook section.
Quality Engineering will track productivity, metric and process automation improvement work items
in the Development-Quality board to service the Development department.
Requirements and requests are to be created with the label
~dev-quality. The head of both departments will review and groom the board on an on-going basis.
Issues will be assigned and worked on by an Engineer in the Engineering Productivity team team and communicated broadly when each work item is completed.
We try to have as few meetings as possible. We currently have 3 recurring meetings for the whole department. Everyone in the Department is free to join and the agenda is available to everyone in the company. Every meeting is also recorded.
The Quality team holds an asynchronous retrospective for each release. The process is automated and notes are captured in Quality retrospectives (GITLAB ONLY)
Moved to release documentation.
Due to the volume of issues, one team cannot handle the triage process. We have invented Triage Reports to scale the triage process within Engineering horizontally.
More on our Triage Operations
The GitLab test automation framework is distributed across three projects:
/qain both GitLab CE and EE.
The Quality Department is committed to ensuring that self-managed customers have performant and scalable configurations. To that end, we are focused on creating a variety of tested and certified Reference Architectures. Additionally, we have developed the GitLab Performance Toolkit, which provides several tools for measuring the performance of any GitLab instance. We use the Toolkit every day to monitor for potential performance degradations, and this tool can also be used by GitLab customers to directly test their on-premise instances. More information is available on our Performance and Scalability page.